SodaStream vs Buying Sparkling Water: I Tracked Every Dollar for a Year
Hi, I'm a sparkling water addict. There, I said it. I was going through two to three cans of LaCroix or Topo Chico every single day. Sometimes more on weekends. My recycling bin was literally 80% sparkling water cans and bottles.
Last March I bought a SodaStream Art for $130 and committed to tracking every single dollar for a full year. Here's exactly what happened.
My Sparkling Water Habit: The Before Picture
Before the SodaStream, here's what my weekly sparkling water spend looked like:
Weekly average: $18-24
Annual cost: ~$1,100
And the waste? About 1,500 cans and 100+ plastic bottles per year. All for water with bubbles in it.
Year One with SodaStream: The Real Numbers
Upfront cost:
Ongoing costs (tracked monthly):
Year one total: $349
Compare that to my previous $1,100/year habit. That's **$751 saved in year one.** And year two will be even cheaper since I already own the machine — just the CO2 refills at $204/year.
But Does It Actually Taste Good?
OK this is the question everyone asks. Here's my honest take.
**Compared to LaCroix/Bubly:** The SodaStream is just as good. Those brands are literally just carbonated water with a hint of flavoring. The SodaStream gives you the same fizz level. Add a squeeze of lemon or lime and you won't miss the cans at all.
**Compared to Topo Chico:** This is where it gets tricky. Topo Chico has a specific mineral taste that SodaStream can't replicate because you're carbonating your own tap water. I found that adding a tiny pinch of mineral salt gets you about 80% of the way there. Not identical, but close enough that I stopped buying Topo Chico.
**Compared to San Pellegrino:** Same deal. The mineral content is different. But honestly, once you adjust, SodaStream water is refreshing in its own way. I don't miss it.
The Plastic Impact
This is where the SodaStream really shines from an environmental perspective.
In one year of use, my SodaStream eliminated:
Each CO2 cylinder carbonates about 60 liters. The cylinders are metal and get exchanged and refilled — not thrown away. The reusable bottles last about a year before needing replacement.
It's not zero waste — you still have the machine itself and occasional bottle replacements. But compared to buying single-serve containers, the reduction is massive.
The Downsides (Keeping It Real)
**The fizz isn't always consistent.** Sometimes you get a perfect Topo Chico-level carbonation. Other times it's a bit flat. You learn the right number of button presses pretty quickly, but there's a learning curve.
**CO2 exchanges are mildly annoying.** You have to go to a store (Target, Bed Bath & Beyond, etc.) and swap your empty cylinder. It takes 5 minutes, but you have to remember to do it before you run out. Running out of CO2 on a Friday night is genuinely tragic.
**The bottles are plastic (BPA-free).** I wish they made glass or stainless options. The bottles are reusable but they do need replacing every year or so per SodaStream's recommendation.
**You need counter space.** The SodaStream Art is about the size of a wine bottle holder. Not huge, but not nothing.
Who Should Get a SodaStream
Who Should Skip It
The Bottom Line
The SodaStream Art paid for itself in under 4 months. Over a year, it saved me $751 and eliminated roughly 1,600 single-use containers. The sparkling water tastes great — not identical to every brand, but genuinely good.
Of all the eco swaps I've made, this one had the most dramatic financial impact. It's not a sacrifice, it's an upgrade. You get unlimited sparkling water whenever you want it, for a fraction of the cost. I genuinely don't know why everyone doesn't have one of these.